
Lusaka, Zambia
AFRICAN SOCIAL FORUM
14 December 2004
We Demand Full Multilateral Debt Cancellation for Africa and
the Global South
Drop the Debt 100% -- All Impoverished Countries -- No Economic
Conditions!
As civil society organizations from across the continent of Africa,
we are confronted every day by the devastating reality of the crisis
of debt. Debt payments to wealthy institutions like the IMF and
World Bank rob our countries of resources we desperately need to
provide health care, fight HIV/AIDS, provide education, and make
available clean water. Debt is a tool of domination used by rich
country governments and creditors like the IMF and World Bank. Conditions
attached to debt relief and loans are devastating our economies
and undermining our choices as sovereign nations.
For impoverished nations, multilateral creditors -- in particular
the IMF and World Bank -- are the largest creditors. They are also
the most powerful: because of their preferred creditor status, countries
must pay their debts back first to these institutions. If countries
do not pay, they are penalized and excluded from most forms of aid
and assistance.
The Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative was launched
by the World Bank in 1996 to provide a robust exit to the crisis
of debt faced by impoverished nations. Eight years on, the program
has failed to achieve this goal. HIPC has provided too little relief,
to too few countries, with devastating conditions. It is time to
move beyond the failed HIPC Initiative towards another approach:
Full (100%) multilateral debt cancellation for all impoverished
nations, without harmful conditions.
We are aware of discussions going on now within the G-7 (in particular
proposals by the UK and US governments), the IMF and World Bank,
and other forums about possibilities for 100% (full) multilateral
debt cancellation. We are encouraged that after many years of half-measures,
full cancellation is being discussed at these levels.
However, we must be clear about the principles for such discussions
to meet the goals and aspirations of African civil society.
First, 100% multilateral debt cancellation is critical. Attempts
to determine a sustainable level of debt for impoverished nations
desperately trying to address the crises of HIV/AIDS and economic
injustice should be rejected. For impoverished nations struggling
to meet the human needs of their peoples, full 100% multilateral
debt cancellation is the only option.
Second, this cancellation must come without any economic conditionalities.
The HIPC program and PRSPs are riddled with conditions such as privatization,
indiscriminate trade liberalization, opening up markets, fiscal
and monetary targets. These conditions have devastated our economies
long enough. Debt cancellation must come without any economic conditions
attached. Moreover, we reject and find that the IMF’s Poverty
Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) must be dismantled and abolished.
The PRGF is not a force for development in our countries; the conditions
attached to loans from this facility have devastated our economies.
It is time to end the role of the IMF in poor countries once and
for all; closing the PRGF is a critical first step towards doing
this.
Third, multilateral debt cancellation must apply to all impoverished
nations, not just the 42 HIPC nations. We reject proposals which
only address countries that have reached HIPC completion point.
Many countries would be excluded from this approach. Moreover, non-HIPC
countries must be included in efforts towards 100% debt cancellation.
Countries including Haiti, Jamaica, and Nigeria are not part of
HIPC Â despite their extreme indebtedness.
Finally, we think that the multilateral financial institutions
should do their fair share, and should contribute the bulk of the
resources to finance debt cancellation. The IMF and World Bank are
two of the richest financial institutions in the world. The IMF
sits atop more than $30 billion in gold which currently serves no
productive purpose. The IMF could sell this gold and use proceeds
to cover debt owed to the World Bank and other multilaterals. The
IBRD could easily mobilize more than $10 billion in accumulated
profits and reserves and could commit a share of its annual multi-billion
dollar profit to debt cancellation. The IMF should close down the
PRGF facility and use its resources to cancel IMF debt. These are
wealthy institutions; it is high time for them to do their fair
share and by paying for debt cancellation, begin to acknowledge
their role and responsibility in the debt crisis.
We do not believe that concerns about the additionality of debt
cancellation should be allowed to postpone the full cancellation
of the multilateral debt. Cancellation is significantly more valuable
to our peoples than additional aid. Aid comes with its own conditions,
and often creates more debt. The resources realized from debt cancellation
can be used as governments -- with ample interventions from civil
society -- see fit. Aid is a promise we have seen broken far too
often; cancellation benefits would be lasting.
Endorsed by the following debt campaigners:
Tafadzwa Muropa - Zimbabwe
Sy Koumbo S. Gale - Chad
Constancia de Pina - Cape Verde
James Kashiki - Zambia
Godfrey Mfiti - Malawi
Rev. Lumu Shabani Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa)
Benoit Essiga - CGT Liberte - Cameroon
Hassan Sayouty - Espace Associatif Maroc - Morocco
Demba Moussa Dembele - Forum for African Alternatives - Senegal
Taoufik BenAbdallah - ENDA - Senegal
Engudat Bekele - PAC - Ethiopia
Bakary Fofana - CECIDE - Guinea
Archinson Mhlata - PCO - South Africa
Pat Dooms - Orange Farm Vision - South Africa
Dao Dounantie - Jubile 2000 / CAD - Mali
Kone Solange - FNDP/ASAPSU - Cote d'Ivoire
Ouattar Diakalia - FNDP - Cote d'Ivoire
Dieng Amady Aly - Forum de Tiers Monde - Senegal
Seydou Ndiaye - ACAPES Senegal
Abubacar Ndiaye, RADI - Senegal
Top
of page
|